Just a thought. Why not separate postgres and postgres jdbc in that case? Jayesh
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Momjian [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 5:56 PM > To: Barry Lind > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JDBC] FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration > > > If we can include the ANT libraries in our CVS then my > > objection to ANT (requiring users to trackdown and download ANT) > goes > > away, and I would then suggest we continue to use ANT for the other > > reasons you mention. > > > > Does anyone know if we could include ANT into our CVS and > redistribute > > it in order to build the jdbc code? Are their license > incompatibilities > > between the Apache License and the PostgreSQL license that would > prevent > > this? > > I don't think we want to go there. Too much bloat to add it. Looks > like 600k. > > -- > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue > + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania > 19026 > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
