Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've already sent a whine-a-gram to the compiler guys at SCO.
Prolly you thought of this already, but: getting them to *add* an implicit #define of __i386__ should be plenty easy compared to getting them to *remove* the one for i386. And while I think they should remove the latter, the immediate problem would be solved as soon as they add the former. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match