> This seems like a valuable feature, as others have mentioned.  However,
> should it also prevent changes to default_transaction_read_only?
> What is the use case for this functionality?

I thought that this was rejected thouroughly by Tom some months ago.  He 
argued pretty strongly that READ ONLY transactions were *not* a security 
feature and that trying to make them one would work very poorly.

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to