Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
> > This seems like a valuable feature, as others have mentioned.  However,
> > should it also prevent changes to default_transaction_read_only?
> >
> > What is the use case for this functionality?
> I thought that this was rejected thouroughly by Tom some months ago.  He 
> argued pretty strongly that READ ONLY transactions were *not* a security 
> feature and that trying to make them one would work very poorly.

I remember something like that, but I thought the patch was the result
of that discussion.  Tom?

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to