Josh Berkus wrote: > Bruce, > > > This seems like a valuable feature, as others have mentioned. However, > > should it also prevent changes to default_transaction_read_only? > > > > What is the use case for this functionality? > > I thought that this was rejected thouroughly by Tom some months ago. He > argued pretty strongly that READ ONLY transactions were *not* a security > feature and that trying to make them one would work very poorly.
I remember something like that, but I thought the patch was the result of that discussion. Tom? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
