Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, my idea of sending a message to stderr saying we are using a
> pre-configured file is so folks aren't surprised by the fact they can't
> see any stderr anymore.
Hm? I thought we'd just established that the patch wasn't going to
suppress output to stderr.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
