Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just did CHECKPOINT;CHECKPOINT and got the warning in the logs. This > needs to be fixed.
See code: /* * Ideally we should only warn if this checkpoint was * requested due to running out of segment files, and not * if it was manually requested. However we can't tell the * difference with the current signalling mechanism. */ I could argue that a client-driven process that issues CHECKPOINT every few seconds is equally deserving of a warning. The only thing wrong is that the HINT is inapplicable ... but that's why it's a HINT and not part of the main message. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings