On Monday September 20 2004 5:45, Ed L. wrote: > On Monday September 20 2004 5:39, Tom Lane wrote: > > "Ed L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > + /* > > > + * We expect a strftime(%z) result of the form "[+-]HHMM" > > > according to + * RFC822-conformant dates, where HH:MM is the > > > unsigned UTC offset. + * If we don't get it, just return zero > > > offset, and let the logs + * rotate on UTC time boundaries. > > > + */ > > > + > > > + count = strftime(msg, 6, "%z", localtime(&now)); > > > > That might work for you, but it's not portable.
Do you consider pg_tm.tm_gmtoff reliable and portable from pg_localtime(&now)? Ed ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
