Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
>> euler=# delete from t1 where t1.a = t3.x;
>> DELETE 1
>> euler=#
>>
>> I think we need at least a NOTICE here. Of course it could be extended
>> to UPDATE too.
> I can see an argument for having a NOTICE here. On the other hand,
> add_missing_from will default to false in 8.1, ...
... but when it is TRUE, there should be a notice, same as there is in
SELECT. UPDATE should produce such a notice too, IMHO. Probably we
omitted the message originally because there was no way to avoid it
in a DELETE, but now there will be.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
