Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
>> euler=# delete from t1 where t1.a = t3.x;
>> euler=# 
>> I think we need at least a NOTICE here. Of course it could be extended
>> to UPDATE too.

> I can see an argument for having a NOTICE here. On the other hand, 
> add_missing_from will default to false in 8.1, ...

... but when it is TRUE, there should be a notice, same as there is in
SELECT.  UPDATE should produce such a notice too, IMHO.  Probably we
omitted the message originally because there was no way to avoid it
in a DELETE, but now there will be.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to