On Saturday 28 May 2005 11:12, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm not against the idea of a config variable, but this is what, the > > third or fourth go around on this? It seems rather unfair to put this > > burden upon the current patch writer at this stage of the game... > > The fact that objections keep being raised should suggest to you that > the idea is not uncontroversial. I think it's necessary to look for a > compromise that everyone can live with. You're really wasting your > breath to repeat the same arguments over and over and expect that > anyone's mind will change. >
I haven't heard a new objection yet that was discussed the previous several go arounds, and yet here we are adding yet another precondition... -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster