On Saturday 28 May 2005 11:12, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm not against the idea of a config variable, but this is what, the
> > third or fourth go around on this?  It seems rather unfair to put this
> > burden upon the current patch writer at this stage of the game...
> The fact that objections keep being raised should suggest to you that
> the idea is not uncontroversial.  I think it's necessary to look for a
> compromise that everyone can live with.  You're really wasting your
> breath to repeat the same arguments over and over and expect that
> anyone's mind will change.

I haven't heard a new objection yet that was discussed the previous several go 
arounds, and yet here we are adding yet another precondition...

Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to