Tom Lane said:

> I'm not sure why this is in TODO; it's a stupid if not outright
> dangerous idea.

I agree, in this case ... BUT ...

This is what bothers me about having such an informal TODO list. There is a
danger that people will work in items only to have them shot down, which is
a great way to turn off developers. And there is also a danger that other
people will think that the todo item is likely to be accepted at some stage.



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to