Bill Moran wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Bill Moran wrote: >> > + if (trace_temp_files != -1) >> > >> >> Might be more robust to say >> >> if (trace_temp_files >= 0) > > Because it would allow for the easy addition of more negative numbers > with magic value? >
because ISTM any negative number here should mean no action is to be taken. Otherwise how else is it different from 0? cheers andrew ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate