> Per previous discussion, the main problem with a uuid type is the
> new-uuid generator function, which tends to involve a bunch of
> not-so-portable assumptions and code. If we accept a uuid type in
> either core or contrib, all of a sudden those portability issues are
> our problem. I'd rather not deal with that.
>
> I'd be willing to accept a core uuid type sans generator function,
> but is that really all that useful?
I think it would. There are plenty of client side libraries that
generate uuid, at least we could provide a native type for them to use.
A generator would be great too of course, but if they really need one
they could use one of the pl languages for it.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
