On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 01:08 -0800, Jeremy Drake wrote: > Yeah, I try to do that, but this one just barely passed my personal > compression threshold. Guess I should raise my threshold :)
No, don't pay any attention to me, I'm just lazy :) > Here is a new version of the patch which fixes up the documentation a > little (should have read it over again before posting). The "doing_srf" business is rather tortured, and seems an invitation for bugs. ISTM there should be a cleaner way to implement this. For example, would it be possible to put all the common logic into one or more additional functions, and then have SRF vs. non-SRF cases that call into those functions after doing the appropriate initialization? -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match