Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have coded up the following patch which places LOG just above ERROR in
> log_min_error_statement.
LOG_NO_STATEMENT? What *are* you thinking? The kindest word I can find
for this is "baroque".
What I had in mind was a one-line patch:
if (edata->elevel >= log_min_error_statement && debug_query_string !=
NULL)
becomes
if (is_log_level_output(edata->elevel, log_min_error_statement) &&
debug_query_string != NULL)
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
