Zoltan Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The idea wouldn't have considered to cross my mind > if Tom didn't mention the action-at-a-distance behaviour.
AFAIR, that remark had to do with NEXT VALUE FOR, which SQL2003 defines in a very weird way (it's not equivalent to nextval() as one would wish). I don't see anything strange in the spec for GENERATED. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate