Tom Lane írta:
Zoltan Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The idea wouldn't have considered to cross my mind
if Tom didn't mention the action-at-a-distance behaviour.


AFAIR, that remark had to do with NEXT VALUE FOR, which SQL2003 defines
in a very weird way (it's not equivalent to nextval() as one would wish).
I don't see anything strange in the spec for GENERATED.

                        regards, tom lane

Thanks for clarifying.
Please review the version I sent you.

--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Geschwinde & Schönig GmbH
http://www.postgresql.at/


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

               http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Reply via email to