Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> If there's more needed here, let's see an official API change,
>> not a hack.

> Well, I guess the obvious API would be something like:
>     PGAsyncStatusType PQasyncStatus(const PGconn *conn);

That would mean exposing PGAsyncStatusType, which doesn't seem like an
amazingly good idea either.  What is it that the patch actually wants
to do?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

                http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Reply via email to