On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 15:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > In > the sync-scan case the idea seems pretty bogus anyway, because the > actual working set will be N backends' rings not just one.
I don't follow. Ideally, in the sync-scan case, the sets of buffers in the ring of different scans on the same relation will overlap completely, right? We might not be at the ideal, but the sets of buffers in the rings shouldn't be disjoint, should they? Regards, Jeff Davis ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly