On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 15:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> In
> the sync-scan case the idea seems pretty bogus anyway, because the
> actual working set will be N backends' rings not just one.

I don't follow. Ideally, in the sync-scan case, the sets of buffers in
the ring of different scans on the same relation will overlap
completely, right?

We might not be at the ideal, but the sets of buffers in the rings
shouldn't be disjoint, should they?

Regards,
        Jeff Davis


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to