> > BTW, one problem I didn't understand at all was that g++ spit up on > bitand() and bitor() as function names. Those are not C++ keywords > to my knowledge; anyone have a theory? >
I forgot these c++ keywords, as you never need to use them in a c++ program: and bitand compl not_eq or_eq xor_eq and_eq bitor not or xor They are equivalents of the operators for use on systems that don't have full character set support. Bitand is the same as &, and bitor is the same as | ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
