Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 10:51:01AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> I'd vote for backpatching, but only as far as 8.2, seeing that we're >>> abandoning the older branches on Windows. > >> Should we backpatch a version of it to previous versions that does just the >> error stack manipulation, or just ignore on the grounds that nobody has >> reported the problem there (it's there, but it's a lot more narrow - I know >> it's there, but I havent' been able to provoket it due to not knowing >> enough about setting up certificate chains and such) > > That's only a cosmetic problem (wrong error message), right? I'd vote > for no backpatch, at least for now --- I'd rather see this change get > through beta testing first. Anytime you're fooling with interactions > with some other package, the risk of portability issues is high.
Right. Applied to HEAD. Will wait for a buildfarm cycle to make sure it doesn't kill anything else then try to backport to 8.2 (patch didn't apply cleanly to it) //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq