Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 10:51:01AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I'd vote for backpatching, but only as far as 8.2, seeing that we're >> abandoning the older branches on Windows.
> Should we backpatch a version of it to previous versions that does just the > error stack manipulation, or just ignore on the grounds that nobody has > reported the problem there (it's there, but it's a lot more narrow - I know > it's there, but I havent' been able to provoket it due to not knowing > enough about setting up certificate chains and such) That's only a cosmetic problem (wrong error message), right? I'd vote for no backpatch, at least for now --- I'd rather see this change get through beta testing first. Anytime you're fooling with interactions with some other package, the risk of portability issues is high. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate