Tom Lane wrote:
> Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > I think there's a window where the process waiting directly on
> > autovacuum could have already fired its deadlock check before it was
> > waiting directly on autovacuum.
> I think you don't understand what that code is doing.  If there's an
> autovac anywhere in the dependency graph, it'll find it.

Thanks for making that explicit, I was trying to build a test case where
it would lock :-)

(If we had concurrent psql we could even have it in the regression tests

Alvaro Herrera                      
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to