Tom Lane wrote: > Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I assume the right thing happens if multiple deadlock check signals fire for > > the same autovacuum? > > Multiple signals shouldn't be a problem, but late-arriving ones could be. > It might be worth having autovac explicitly clear QueryCancelPending > after it's finished a table, so that a SIGINT sent because of activity > on one table couldn't force cancellation of vacuum on the next one.
Ok, committed; I snuck that in as well, but I'm not sure how to test that it works. I adjusted the comments -- I think they're more correct now. I also added a puny paragraph to lmgr/README. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
