"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> I think there's a window where the process waiting directly on
>> autovacuum could have already fired its deadlock check before it was
>> waiting directly on autovacuum.
> I think you don't understand what that code is doing.  If there's an
> autovac anywhere in the dependency graph, it'll find it.

That'll teach me to try to read code from a patch directly without trying to
apply it or at least read the original source next to it. I thought I had seen
this code recently enough to apply the patch from memory -- clearly not.

I assume the right thing happens if multiple deadlock check signals fire for
the same autovacuum?

  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to