"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I think there's a window where the process waiting directly on >> autovacuum could have already fired its deadlock check before it was >> waiting directly on autovacuum. > > I think you don't understand what that code is doing. If there's an > autovac anywhere in the dependency graph, it'll find it.
That'll teach me to try to read code from a patch directly without trying to apply it or at least read the original source next to it. I thought I had seen this code recently enough to apply the patch from memory -- clearly not. I assume the right thing happens if multiple deadlock check signals fire for the same autovacuum? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
