On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:55:53AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 09:58:26PM -0500, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> >> On Nov 28, 2007 3:53 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Entirely removing the example of how to do it with rules doesn't
> >>> seem like a good idea.
> >> 
> >> Agreed.
> > Do you have an example of one use case where using RULEs rather
> > than TRIGGERs is a good idea?
> The argument I made for keeping the example around is not dependent
> on the assumption that using a rule is a good idea.  It's dependent
> on the established fact that we have recommended that in prior
> releases, and therefore people are going to be seeing that construct
> in real databases.

We've corrected mistakes in the manual before :)

David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not

Reply via email to