> > > The argument I made for keeping the example around is not dependent on > > the assumption that using a rule is a good idea. It's dependent on > > the established fact that we have recommended that in prior releases, > > and therefore people are going to be seeing that construct in real > > databases. > > And they could refer back to the older version of the documentation for > it. In fact, we should mention that in the patch: > > <note><para>If you have a partitioning setup that uses rules please > refer to the 8.2 documentation on partitioning</para></note> >
+1 Regards, Nikhils -- EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
