> > The argument I made for keeping the example around is not dependent on
> > the assumption that using a rule is a good idea.  It's dependent on
> > the established fact that we have recommended that in prior releases,
> > and therefore people are going to be seeing that construct in real
> > databases.
> And they could refer back to the older version of the documentation for
> it. In fact, we should mention that in the patch:
> <note><para>If you have a partitioning setup that uses rules please
> refer to the 8.2 documentation on partitioning</para></note>


EnterpriseDB               http://www.enterprisedb.com

Reply via email to