"Brendan Jurd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 21/03/2008, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The code is now set up so that it can pass an entire field value
>> through gettext(), but if gettext recognizes the strings "foo" and
>> "bar" that doesn't mean it will do anything useful with "foo\nbar",
>> which is what this patch would require.

> Ouch!

> We can't just build the output table by hand like
> describeOneTableDetails does?  Admittedly it's kludgy, but it's not an
> unprecedented kludge.

Oh, I had forgotten the existence of that entry point in print.c.  Yeah,
it might be workable --- want to have a go at it?

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to