"Brendan Jurd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 21/03/2008, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The code is now set up so that it can pass an entire field value
>> through gettext(), but if gettext recognizes the strings "foo" and
>> "bar" that doesn't mean it will do anything useful with "foo\nbar",
>> which is what this patch would require.
> Ouch!
> We can't just build the output table by hand like
> describeOneTableDetails does? Admittedly it's kludgy, but it's not an
> unprecedented kludge.
Oh, I had forgotten the existence of that entry point in print.c. Yeah,
it might be workable --- want to have a go at it?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
