Tom Lane escribió: > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Brendan Jurd escribi�: > >> Here's my attempt to remove the typename field from A_Const. There > >> were a few places (notably flatten_set_variable_args() in guc.c, and > >> typenameTypeMod() in parse_type.c) where the code expected to see an > >> A_Const with a typename, and I had to adjust for an A_Const within a > >> TypeCast. Nonetheless, there was an overall net reduction of 34 lines > >> of code, so I think this was a win. > > > Do say ... why don't we do away with A_Const altogether and just replace > > it with Value? After this patch, I don't see what's the difference. > > They're logically different things, and after I get done putting a parse > location field into A_Const, they'll still be physically different too.
Aha. Are you working from Brendan's patch? I was going to commit it. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches