Tom Lane escribió:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I came up with the attached patch.
> I wasn't envisioning anything anywhere near this invasive.  We only
> need locations on constants in a few contexts, I think.

Aha.  OK, I'll commit the original patch and let you deal with the rest
of it :-)

> BTW, you broke _equalAConst() ... it was a bad idea anyway to recast
> it on the assumption that there would never again be more than one
> field.

Oops, sorry, I had intended to revert that part and forgot.

Alvaro Herrera                      
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to