Martin Pihlak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now I just realized that the current patch doesn't handle this quite > correctly. Modified patch attached.
Applied with revisions as per discussion.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
