Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Shouldn't we at least make it fail with EINVAL if "who" doesn't match
whichever semantics this code is able to implement?
Yeah, we only ever call it asking for our own process, but I guess we
might at some point in the future change that, so it can't hurt.. Want
me to do it, or will you?
Please do, I'm going to bed ...
Done.
//Magnus
--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
