On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Agreed --- I committed what I had, anyone want to volunteer for > refactoring the execution of DropStmt?
Sure! see the attached patch... > After looking again, I think that this is not technically very > difficult, but coming up with something that looks tasteful to everyone > might be tricky. In particular I didn't see a nice way to do it without > using struct ObjectAddress in a bunch of header files that don't > currently include dependency.h. A possible response to that is to move > ObjectAddress into postgres.h, but that seems a bit ugly too. Ok I'm obviously missing something important... Why not Just make the various Remove* functions take a list? I'm not proposing this patch for actual submission, more of a would this work? If I'm not missing something glaring obvious Ill go ahead and make the rest of the Remove things behave the same way
dropStmt_mutlidelete.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
