Alex Hunsaker escribió:
> Ok I'm obviously missing something important... Why not Just make the
> various Remove* functions take a list?
> I'm not proposing this patch for actual submission, more of a would this work?
> If I'm not missing something glaring obvious Ill go ahead and make the
> rest of the Remove things behave the same way
I don't think there's anything wrong with that in principle. However,
does your patch actually work? The changes in expected/ is unexpected,
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: