2008/7/13 Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 17:03 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> this is third variant with variadic argumen as scalar. But I still
>> strongly prefer second variant with conformance declared variadic
>> array with used array variable.

you checked second or third variant? There are two variants still.
Pavel Stehule

Please, Tom, can you choose one?

> This version allows you to declare two functions "foo(variadic numeric)"
> and "foo(numeric)", and then if you do a "\df foo" the backend crashes.
> Also, you didn't update an error string:
> "variadic argument isn't an array" should (in this version) be something
> like: "can't find array type for variadic parameter type %s"
> I suggest a slightly different wording for the following error messages:
> "aggregate function has variadic argument" -> "variadic parameters not
> supported for aggregate functions"
> and
> "variadic argument isn't last function's argument" -> "variadic
> parameter must be the last parameter to the function"
> Those are just suggested wordings.
> Regards,
>        Jeff Davis

Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to