Hello 2008/7/13 Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 17:03 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> this is third variant with variadic argumen as scalar. But I still >> strongly prefer second variant with conformance declared variadic >> array with used array variable. >
you checked second or third variant? There are two variants still. Regards Pavel Stehule Please, Tom, can you choose one? > This version allows you to declare two functions "foo(variadic numeric)" > and "foo(numeric)", and then if you do a "\df foo" the backend crashes. > > Also, you didn't update an error string: > > "variadic argument isn't an array" should (in this version) be something > like: "can't find array type for variadic parameter type %s" > > I suggest a slightly different wording for the following error messages: > > "aggregate function has variadic argument" -> "variadic parameters not > supported for aggregate functions" > > and > > "variadic argument isn't last function's argument" -> "variadic > parameter must be the last parameter to the function" > > Those are just suggested wordings. > > Regards, > Jeff Davis > > -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
