2008/7/13 Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 07:52 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> you checked second or third variant? There are two variants still. > > Sorry for being unclear. Those comments regarded patch v2.2.1. The bug > is in pg_function_is_visible(). it's bug, I'll fix it
> > Additionally, I'd like to see support for calling variadic functions > with no arguments. I mentioned that in my other email, but it applies to > v2.2.1 as well. for some cases, I can do less restriction. > > And we should come to a consensus quickly about the declaration style, > e.g. "variadic int[]" or "variadic int". ok > > Regards, > Jeff Davis > > thank you very much Pavel Stehule -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-patches
