On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 11:46:05 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Advertising
> Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Not sure at what point it will topple, in my case it didn't matter > > if it ran good with 5 clients as I'll always have many more clients > > than 5. > > I did some idle, very unscientific tests the other day that indicated > that MySQL insert performance starts to suck with just 2 concurrent > inserters. Given a file containing 10000 INSERT commands, a single > mysql client ran the file in about a second. So if I feed the file > simultaneously to two mysqls in two shell windows, it should take > about two seconds total to do the 20000 inserts, right? The observed > times were 13 to 15 seconds. (I believe this is with a MyISAM table, > since I just said CREATE TABLE without any options.) > MyISAM is well known to suck if you update/insert/delete because it simply aquires a full table lock when you perform those operations! InnoDB is supposed to be better at that. So your results are fairly in line with what you should see. -- Jeff Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.jefftrout.com/ http://www.stuarthamm.net/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
