It says: Using anticipatory io scheduler.
This then fits with the earlier post on other observations of up to 10 times better performance, which I what I was seeing in in certain circumstances. Cheers, Gary. On 4 Apr 2004 at 6:04, Cott Lang wrote: > On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 01:56, Gary Doades wrote: > > Unfortunately I don't understand the question! > > > > My background is the primarily Win32. The last time I used a *nix OS > > was about 20 years ago apart from occasional dips into the linux OS > > over the past few years. If you can tell be how to find out what you want > > I will gladly give you the information. > > There are two available io schedulers in 2.6 (new feature), deadline and > anticipatory. It should show be listed in the boot messages: > > dmesg | grep scheduler > > I've seen people arguing for each of the two schedulers, saying one is > better than the other for databases. I'm curious which one you're > using. :) > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 7.0.230 / Virus Database: 262.6.5 - Release Date: 31/03/2004 > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
