On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 09:09:16AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:

> If your intention in this test is to show the superiority of raw devices, let 
> me give you a reality check: barring some major corporate backing getting 
> involved, we can't possibly implement our own PG-FS for database support.  We 
> already have a TODO list which is far too long for our developer pool, and 
> implementing a custom FS either takes a large team (OCFS) or several years of 
> development (Reiser).   

Is there any documentation as to what guarantees PostgreSQL requires
from the filesystem, or what posix semantics can be relaxed?


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to