On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 21:12:18 +0100, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I guess what I'm saying is it's not how many people you've got working > on the optimizer, its how many accurate field reports of less-than > perfect optimization reach them. In that case, PostgreSQL is likely in a > better position than Microsoft, since the accessibility of the pg > discussion lists makes such cases much more likely to get aired. > > Any thoughts?
I have seen exactly this happen a number of times over the last several years. However there is still only one Tom Lane implementing the improvements. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org