What MySQl-table-type did you use? Was it "MyISAM" which don't supports transactions ? Yes I read about that bulk-inserts with this table-type are very fast. In Data Warehouse one often don't need transactions.Advertising
Leeuw van der, Tim schrieb:
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Steinar H. Gunderson
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 3:33 PM
To: PostgreSQL Performance List
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 02:42:20PM +0200, Leeuw van der, Tim wrote: > > - PostgreSQL 7.3 running on CYGWIN with cygipc daemon > > Isn't this doomed to kill your performance anyhow?
Yes and no, therefore I mentioned it explicitly as one of the caveats. When doing selects I could get performance very comparable to MySQL, so I don't want to blame poor insert-performance on cygwin/cygipc per se.
I'm not working on this app. anymore and don't have a working test-environment for it anymore so I cannot retest now with more recent versions.
regards,
--Tim
> > /* Steinar */ > -- > Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
