On 22 May 2013 13:20, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2013-05-22, at 14:02, Frank Shearar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 22 May 2013 12:49, stephane ducasse <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> ./pharo Pharo.image config filetree://`pwd`/../src/ >>>>> >>>>> Fails on trying to execute #mcRepositoryAsUser:withPassword: on a >>>>> GenericUrl >>>>> instance inside Gofer. >>>> >>>> Yep, I'd agree with your assessment. Has Pharo forked Gofer, or does >>>> it still use Lukas Renggli's repository? >>> >>> We forked it. We cannot built a part of our infrastructure on a project >>> that can vanished in nature. >> >> Well. What I should have asked was "have you cloned the repository >> with the intention of pushing improvements upstream, or have you >> forked the project with no intention of pushing changes upstream?" > > well, check on how much we changed in detail and them come back.
Sorry, was that supposed to be an answer? I must go find out how much work you've done before guessing whether you've forked and abandoned upstream? Like I said: What I want to know is this: if I want to make a change to infrastructure common to multiple Smalltalks, does Pharo expect me to submit special unique snowflake additions to Pharo AND to upstream? frank
