On 2013-09-13, at 12:09, Chris Cunningham <cunningham...@gmail.com> wrote: > so, if this is a class, would Session be an appropriate superclass for a > WebSession class? or any other type of Session class?
I would say so. It is as generic as the name suggests. The class is lightweight and only contains the time when it was created. > That particular > name would seem to collide with other forms of Sessions, wouldn't it? Or > is this safely hidden in a Pharo Environment, so it won't collide elsewhere > (or entice other developers to try to use it for other Session style > objects)? It is a normal class, thus yes, collision is possible. Again, it can easily serve as a superclass for other session-like objects.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
