sure, go ahead. On 2013-09-16, at 05:13, Igor Stasenko <[email protected]> wrote:
> i would like session to support a cache. > something like > either: > Smalltalk session at: x ifAbsentPut: [ y ] > or > Smalltalk session cacheAt: x ifAbsentPut: [ y ] > > > > On 13 September 2013 17:27, Camillo Bruni <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 2013-09-13, at 12:09, Chris Cunningham <[email protected]> wrote: >>> so, if this is a class, would Session be an appropriate superclass for a >>> WebSession class? or any other type of Session class? >> >> I would say so. It is as generic as the name suggests. The class is >> lightweight >> and only contains the time when it was created. >> >>> That particular >>> name would seem to collide with other forms of Sessions, wouldn't it? Or >>> is this safely hidden in a Pharo Environment, so it won't collide >> elsewhere >>> (or entice other developers to try to use it for other Session style >>> objects)? >> >> It is a normal class, thus yes, collision is possible. Again, it can easily >> serve as a superclass for other session-like objects. >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Igor Stasenko.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
