On 24 Nov 2013, at 21:08, [email protected] wrote: > This makes think of the tick tock model of Intel improvements. > > http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/silicon-innovations/intel-tick-tock-model-general.html > > Looks like with 2.0 and 3.0 we are going to have two "tick"s in a row. That > may be too much. > > I am afraid even trying out 3.0 when reading about all the moving parts that > are changing in all corners. >
Maybe we should give up, define Pharo as finished and be happy.
Marcus
