> Am 24.11.2013 um 21:18 schrieb Marcus Denker <[email protected]>: > > >> On 24 Nov 2013, at 21:08, [email protected] wrote: >> >> This makes think of the tick tock model of Intel improvements. >> >> http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/silicon-innovations/intel-tick-tock-model-general.html >> >> Looks like with 2.0 and 3.0 we are going to have two "tick"s in a row. That >> may be too much. >> >> I am afraid even trying out 3.0 when reading about all the moving parts that >> are changing in all corners. > > Maybe we should give up, define Pharo as finished and be happy.
I don't think that every statement that has a notion like the one from phil needs a response out of self-defense. This will happen as long as the "researcher guys" and the "industry guys" share the same table. It is just the way it is and we are free to leave statements uncommented. Norbert
