On 25 Nov 2013, at 10:04, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 25 Nov 2013, at 09:19, [email protected] wrote: > >> Exactly. This researcher/industry - lab/delivery is always present, no >> matter where one goes. >> >> I was thinking more along the lines of: >> >> >> Investing in the industry >> >> Thousands of vendors depend on Intel® processors for product development. To >> help them forge ahead with new product advancements, Intel invests heavily >> in research that drives innovations at the silicon level and establishes >> new, industry-wide standards. Combined with the predictability of Intel’s >> tick-tock model, these efforts promote faster, more efficient innovation >> throughout the industry—year-in and year-out. >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Yes, and tick-tock as well as research all happens in parallel. > > Now how can we get the resource to do that? > > In the end, the “stable/unstable” is very much like a tick/tock: we release, > when we find problems in the release (and we find a fix…) we fix the release > (tik), > while working in tok (big change). > > It would be better to have payed teams for both… > With “payed” I don’t mean the money aspect but the fact that someone will look at the bug tracker every day and spend all hours needed to fix even those bugs that he/she does not care about at all and has never managed to run into. Marcus
