On 30 Dec 2013, at 09:54, Johan Brichau <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 30 Dec 2013, at 09:50, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> imho, it seems more appropriate to keep them with the image since it’s the >>> image that determines the Pharo version and not the vm. >> >> Keeping them with the VM makes for easier sharing (just one copy, never >> think of it again, run images from everywhere). These are different styles I >> guess. > > I guess it does not hurt to look at both places. > In 10 years from now, you might no longer have the V10.sources anymore with > your vm but you might want to dive into a 2011 image of Zinc on Pharo1.4 for > good ‘ol times sake ;-)
in 10 months from now (not years), if everything goes fine, sources will come inside image (also changes)… in an unique super-file :) but well, we are not still in that point… and 10 months is just a desire than a fact :) Esteban > > cheers > Johan
