On 30 Dec 2013, at 09:51, Sven Van Caekenberghe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 30 Dec 2013, at 08:29, Johan Brichau <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 29 Dec 2013, at 22:16, Esteban Lorenzano <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> yeah, but I also remember a discussion of “now, sources should be always >>> (and just there) with vm… or the opposite”… >> >> imho, it seems more appropriate to keep them with the image since it’s the >> image that determines the Pharo version and not the vm. > > Keeping them with the VM makes for easier sharing (just one copy, never think > of it again, run images from everywhere). These are different styles I guess. We need to get rid of it. The mental overhead it produces is costing far more then the memory it saves (and now we soon have 2014, so if it was “too much memory” for Pharo3, it will by definition not be for Pharo4 thanks to time passing…) Marcus
