Thank you for your motivation :) Ben
On 27 Jan 2014, at 20:57, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: > Yes, I just tested: > > UserManager instVarNamed: 'default' put: nil. > UserManager initialize. > > fixes the release tests. > > I have to go to bed though ;-) > > Thx! > > Sven > > On 28 Jan 2014, at 00:54, Benjamin <benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I think the fix https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?12711 might need to be >> applied again >> >> Ben >> >> On 27 Jan 2014, at 20:33, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 28 Jan 2014, at 00:18, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: >>> >>>> OK, I will try and trust you and Sean. >>> >>> Well, it is in 30 726, but there are 2 regressions found: >>> >>> ReleaseTests.ReleaseTest.testObsoleteClasses >>> ReleaseTests.ReleaseTest.testUnknownProcesses >>> >>> on all 3 platforms, these might be transient, but with all the renaming >>> something could have gone wrong.... >>> >>>> On 28 Jan 2014, at 00:13, Benjamin <benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 27 Jan 2014, at 20:08, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: >>>>>> Are the compatible ? >>>>>> Does one have to come before the other ? >>>>>> Are they both needed ? >>>>> >>>>> I think we should drop >>>>>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12717/ReactiveVariable-NewValueHolder >>>>> >>>>> and integrate >>>>>> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/12684/NewValueHolder-Enhancements >>>>> >>>>> For at least two reasons: >>>>> - I added hooks for Spec to continue working with the slice I proposed >>>>> (otherwise no more Spec fix until the release) >>>>> - I do not have to review it :P >>>>> >>>>> Ok maybe the second point is not that relevant LOL >>>>> Just that I am sure that the fix I proposed works well with Spec. >>>>> And I an pretty sure the other will break it :) >>>>> >>>>> I was not aware of another case related to this. >>>>> It is not flagged Spec nor my name, so there is no way for me to guess it >>>>> exists. >>>>> >>>>> Ben >>>> >>> >>> >> > >
