2014-01-28 Pharo4Stef <pharo4s...@free.fr> > On 28 Jan 2014, at 13:53, Pharo4Stef <pharo4s...@free.fr> wrote: > > Ben > > I still think that it would have been good to discuss the valueHolder > changes in Spec > before doing it. > > > This has been discussed for 2-3 days before I made it actually. > > > Where? because I do not talk about just the question of sean about the > name. > But the impact. >
I missed that discussion too. And I don't like the name either. I would prefere Binding or ValueBinding. But I am already happe that it does not break code anymore :) > > Because it broke the tools of people that used Spec like martin and clement > as well as the documentation ignaccio wrote. We should be cautious about > other people too. > > > It actually did not break anything. > > > ah so you did not remove asValueHolder. > > And it had been reverted two days ago > > > ok good then. > > > Ben > >
